Both specialise in APAC and both deliver high-quality emails and mobiles. disburse is built to be used through Claude, ChatGPT and Codex and costs a fraction per contact. Firmable is a traditional filter-based database with more account intelligence on each company.
A$4 per 1,000 contacts against A$165+. Mobiles cost the same as emails.
Describe your buyer in plain English, or click through filters. Pick the one you already work in.
Firmable holds more per-company detail, the kind enterprise sales teams lean on.
ENTRY MONTH-TO-MONTH PLAN ON BOTH SIDES, IN AUD.
THE RED DOT MARKS THE STRONGER ANSWER · BLANK MEANS IT IS A WASH
PLAIN ENGLISH IN · A RANKED LIST OUT · ONE CALL
disburse was built to be driven by an LLM. Firmable's MCP exists, but it calls the same strict filters and taxonomies as their UI, so the model gets whatever those filters allow rather than what it asked for. disburse vectorises the whole index so it understands what you meant, not just which tag you ticked.
USE BOTH WHEN YOU NEED US OR EMEA DATA AS WELL AS APAC, OR WHEN YOU RUN WATERFALL ENRICHMENT ACROSS PROVIDERS.
The cheapest cost per credit on both emails and mobiles, so it is the right primary source. Search is free, so misses cost nothing.
Anything disburse did not have, plus the markets disburse does not index yet. Sometimes one provider has a record the other does not.
Based on the entry-level month-to-month pricing compared on this page, yes. disburse is designed to make contact data significantly more affordable, particularly for teams that need large volumes of email addresses or mobile numbers. That makes it particularly useful for outbound teams, agencies and data-heavy workflows where the cost per contact matters.
disburse is purpose-built to work through AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Codex rather than through a traditional filter-based database interface. You describe the companies or people you want in natural language instead of translating your request into predefined industry classifications, job-title filters and database taxonomies. A request such as "CEOs of FMCG companies in Australia" is interpreted using company descriptions, summaries and related industry information rather than relying on a single exact FMCG category.
It depends on what you are looking for. Both have the firmographic company intel you would expect: company size, location, funding rounds, domain, social profiles and so on. Firmable does provide a broader range of account intelligence and company-level features, which may be useful for enterprise sales teams wanting a more traditional sales-intelligence platform. disburse is focused on helping you quickly identify relevant people and companies and obtain high-quality contact data at a low cost. If extensive account intelligence is central to your workflow, Firmable may offer functionality that disburse does not currently provide.
That depends on how you prefer to work. If you are comfortable using ChatGPT, Claude or similar AI tools, disburse can be considerably simpler because you just describe the audience you want rather than configuring a long list of filters. If you prefer a traditional graphical database where you select industries, titles, locations and other criteria from predefined filters, Firmable's interface may feel more familiar.
For APAC prospecting where your main requirement is finding relevant contacts and obtaining email addresses or mobile numbers, disburse can be the primary data source because of its lower cost and AI-native workflow. Firmable may be useful alongside disburse if you need broader international coverage, additional account intelligence, or want to use multiple providers in a waterfall enrichment process. Using both can also improve overall coverage, as one provider may occasionally have a record that the other does not.