DISBURSE/ blog
← BLOG

ZoomInfo vs Disburse: Which Is Better for Building Targeted Lead Lists?

14 min readLachlan McBride White

ZoomInfo and Disburse can both help businesses build targeted B2B lead lists.

But they are designed around different prospecting workflows.

ZoomInfo is an enterprise sales intelligence platform. It combines contact data, company data, technographics, buyer intent, org insights and CRM enrichment.

Disburse is more focused.

It helps users describe the companies and decision-makers they want, retrieve the relevant contact data, and use those leads in the sales or AI tools they already prefer.

The short answer: For businesses mainly focused on building highly targeted B2B lead lists, Disburse is likely the better fit when simplicity, speed, natural-language search and flexible data access matter most.

ZoomInfo is stronger when lead-list creation depends on deeper account intelligence such as technographics, buyer intent, website activity and enterprise CRM context.

ZoomInfo vs Disburse for lead-list building at a glance

Disburse

Primary use case: Targeted B2B lead discoveryNatural-language search: Core experienceContact data: YesCompany data: YesBusiness emails: YesDirect/mobile numbers: YesLinkedIn URLs: YesJob title targeting: YesSeniority targeting: YesIndustry targeting: YesRevenue targeting: YesEmployee count targeting: YesGeography targeting: YesNAICS: YesTechnographics: Not a core featureBuyer intent: Not a core featureWebsite visitor signals: NoCRM enrichment: External workflowsREST API: YesMCP / AI workflows: YesBest for: Building targeted lists quickly

ZoomInfo

Primary use case: Enterprise sales intelligenceNatural-language search: AI-assisted capabilitiesContact data: YesCompany data: YesBusiness emails: YesDirect/mobile numbers: YesLinkedIn URLs: YesJob title targeting: YesSeniority targeting: YesIndustry targeting: YesRevenue targeting: YesEmployee count targeting: YesGeography targeting: YesNAICS: YesTechnographics: YesBuyer intent: YesWebsite visitor signals: YesCRM enrichment: Extensive native functionalityREST API: YesMCP / AI workflows: API and AI integrationsBest for: Building intelligence-rich account lists

Which is better for building targeted lead lists?

For straightforward ICP-based lead generation, Disburse has a strong advantage in simplicity.

A user can describe the exact type of prospect they want.

For example:

“Find founders of Australian B2B SaaS companies with 10–100 employees.”

Or:

“Find Heads of Sales at Singaporean fintech companies with 50–200 employees.”

Or:

“Find CFOs at New Zealand manufacturing companies with A$20 million to A$100 million in revenue.”

Disburse interprets the request and returns matching companies and decision-makers.

ZoomInfo can also build highly targeted lists.

Its strength is the amount of intelligence that can be layered into the query.

A ZoomInfo user can combine company size, industry, revenue and geography with:

  • Technologies used

  • Buyer intent

  • Org structure

  • Website activity

  • Account signals

So the difference is not whether either platform can build targeted lists.

It is how much intelligence you need around the targeting process.

How does Disburse build targeted lead lists?

Disburse is designed around natural-language prospect discovery.

Instead of building a search one filter at a time, the user describes the outcome.

For example:

“Find Managing Directors of Australian engineering consultancies with 20–200 employees.”

Or:

“Find senior HR leaders at professional services firms in Australia and New Zealand with more than 200 employees.”

Disburse can search across person, contact, company and geography data.

This can include:

  • Name

  • Job title

  • Seniority

  • Job function

  • Email availability

  • Phone availability

  • Company name

  • Company domain

  • Industry

  • NAICS

  • Entity type

  • Revenue

  • Employee count

  • Locations

  • Specialties

  • City

  • Region

  • Country

This makes it easy to turn a real-world ICP into a lead list.

How does ZoomInfo build targeted lead lists?

ZoomInfo provides a deeper sales intelligence environment.

Users can combine company and contact criteria with extra information such as:

  • Technologies

  • Buyer intent

  • Company changes

  • Website visitors

  • Org structures

  • CRM data

  • Account activity

This is especially useful for enterprise teams that do not only want to know:

“Who fits our ICP?”

They may also want to know:

“Which of those accounts should our salespeople prioritise right now?”

That distinction matters.

Disburse is mainly about identifying the right people and companies.

ZoomInfo helps teams identify, understand and prioritise accounts in greater depth.

Which is better for highly specific ICP searches?

For ICPs based on standard person and company attributes, Disburse is particularly strong.

For example:

“Find founders of Australian cybersecurity companies with 20–100 employees.”

“Find Finance Directors at New Zealand logistics companies with more than A$10 million in revenue.”

“Find Heads of Marketing at Singaporean SaaS companies with 50–500 employees.”

These are highly specific lists, but the criteria are easy to express.

ZoomInfo becomes stronger when the ICP includes more advanced intelligence.

For example:

“Find software companies in Australia and Singapore with 100–500 employees that use Salesforce and are showing relevant buying signals.”

That type of query goes beyond standard firmographic targeting.

It plays more directly to ZoomInfo’s strengths.

The distinction is simple:

Disburse is strong for detailed ICP targeting.

ZoomInfo is stronger for intelligence-layered targeting.

Which is faster for building lead lists?

For straightforward ICP searches, Disburse is designed to reduce the steps between deciding who you want and retrieving the contacts.

The workflow is:

Describe the audience → search → retrieve the leads.

That is especially useful when users regularly switch between target markets.

An APAC sales team might search:

“Founders of Australian SaaS companies with 20–100 employees.”

Then:

“Sales Directors at Singaporean software companies with 50–200 employees.”

Then:

“Managing Directors of New Zealand recruitment firms with 20–100 employees.”

The user can describe each new audience directly.

They do not need to rebuild a complex prospecting setup every time.

ZoomInfo provides more depth when the search also needs extra sales intelligence.

Which is better for APAC lead generation?

Disburse is especially relevant for teams prospecting across APAC because regional ICPs can be described naturally.

For example:

“Find founders of B2B SaaS companies in Australia, New Zealand and Singapore with 10–100 employees.”

Or:

“Find senior sales leaders at fintech companies in Singapore and Hong Kong.”

Or:

“Find CFOs at Australian and New Zealand manufacturing businesses with more than 100 employees.”

This makes it easy to create separate segments across APAC markets.

ZoomInfo has broad international coverage and deeper enterprise intelligence.

But APAC teams should not rely only on headline global database size.

The more useful test is how well each provider covers the actual countries, industries, company sizes and decision-makers being targeted.

Which is better for founders and small sales teams?

For founders and smaller sales teams mainly building prospect lists, Disburse is likely to be the simpler option.

These teams often know exactly who they want to reach.

But they may not have dedicated RevOps resources.

A founder may already know:

“We sell to Australian recruitment agencies with 20–100 employees, and the founder usually buys.”

That description is enough to begin searching in Disburse.

The team may not need buyer-intent programmes, enterprise CRM enrichment, website visitor intelligence or complex account prioritisation just to find those prospects.

If the main outcome is:

“Give us the companies and the right people.”

Disburse provides a more focused route.

Which is better for large sales organisations?

ZoomInfo has the stronger case for enterprise revenue teams.

Large sales organisations often need more than a list.

They may want to know:

  • Which accounts are in-market

  • Which technologies they use

  • What is changing inside the organisation

  • How CRM records should be enriched

  • Which accounts should get attention first

ZoomInfo’s broader intelligence layer is built for this type of sales operation.

Disburse can still be useful for larger businesses that already have their preferred sales infrastructure and simply need targeted B2B data.

Which gives you more relevant leads?

Neither platform can guarantee universally better relevance.

Relevance depends on two things:

  1. Whether the search reflects the real ICP.

  2. Whether the underlying data covers that audience well.

Disburse’s advantage is that the user can express the ICP directly.

That can reduce the gap between:

what the salesperson means

and

how the prospecting query is built.

ZoomInfo’s advantage is that teams can add more account-level intelligence to the targeting process.

If relevance means:

“Does this company and person match our ICP?”

Disburse is especially well suited.

If relevance also means:

“Is there extra intelligence suggesting this account should be prioritised now?”

ZoomInfo provides more native capability.

Which is better for building lists across multiple industries?

Disburse is especially useful when target audiences change often.

An agency, recruiter or multi-product business may need completely different lists from one day to the next.

For example:

“Founders of Australian SaaS companies with 10–100 employees.”

“Operations Directors at Singaporean logistics companies with more than 200 employees.”

“Managing Partners at New Zealand accounting firms with 20–100 employees.”

Because the search starts with a description of the audience, switching between ICPs is straightforward.

ZoomInfo can also create and save many segments.

Its deeper filtering may be more useful where each market needs advanced sales-intelligence criteria.

Which is better for testing a new ICP?

Disburse has a useful model for businesses testing new target markets.

Searching is unlimited.

A company can explore different searches before deciding which leads it actually wants to retrieve.

For an APAC business, that might mean comparing:

  • Australian SaaS founders

  • Singaporean fintech sales leaders

  • New Zealand professional-services executives

Credits are used when leads are retrieved.

For early-stage businesses, agencies and teams entering new markets, this can reduce the cost of testing an ICP.

Which provides better contact data?

There is no universal winner.

Contact-data quality can vary by:

  • Geography

  • Industry

  • Company size

  • Seniority

  • Type of contact information

ZoomInfo has an advantage in maturity, scale and the amount of intelligence attached to each account.

Disburse is more focused on retrieving usable person and company records that match a defined search.

For lead-list building, the most useful question is not:

“Who has the biggest database?”

It is:

“Who can reliably find the prospects we actually sell to?”

For APAC teams in particular, testing real searches is more useful than relying only on global database-size figures.

Which is better for phone-based lead lists?

Disburse can return available direct phone data alongside the rest of the prospect record.

Its credit model is simple:

One credit = one lead.

Mobile numbers do not cost extra credits.

That means a team building lists for email and calling does not need to calculate a separate credit cost for mobile data.

ZoomInfo also provides direct-dial and mobile information.

The difference is less about whether phone data exists and more about the pricing and platform model around it.

Which is better for AI-generated lead lists?

Disburse has a strong use case here.

It supports:

  • Natural-language discovery

  • REST access

  • MCP access

This means prospect data can be requested as part of an AI-driven workflow.

For example, an AI workflow could request:

“Find founders of Australian cybersecurity businesses with 20–100 employees.”

The structured data can then be used by another application or workflow.

Lead-list creation does not need to happen inside a traditional sales database.

ZoomInfo also offers APIs, integrations and AI tools around its wider GTM intelligence platform.

For advanced enterprise AI workflows, that breadth can be useful.

For straightforward AI-to-B2B-data retrieval, Disburse is more focused.

Which is better if you already have a CRM and outreach tools?

This is one of the strongest cases for Disburse.

Many sales teams already have:

CRM → outreach → calling → meetings → reporting

What they need is the data feeding into those systems.

Disburse is designed to provide that data without requiring the company to reorganise its sales workflow around another broad platform.

ZoomInfo also integrates deeply with major CRM and sales systems.

Its enrichment features can be valuable for larger organisations.

The difference is:

Disburse can act as the B2B data layer inside your existing stack.

ZoomInfo can become a deeper intelligence layer across the GTM stack.

Which is better for high-volume lead lists?

Disburse becomes especially attractive when a team needs large contact volumes.

Current plans include:

  • Free: A$0 with 50 credits/month

  • Growth: A$20/month with 5,000 credits/month and up to five team members

  • Scale: A$99/month with 50,000 credits/month and unlimited team members

  • Enterprise: Custom pricing for larger requirements

One credit equals one lead.

Searching is unlimited.

Mobile numbers cost no extra credits.

There is no annual lock-in.

Growth credit top-ups never expire.

That makes the relationship between lead volume and cost easy to understand.

ZoomInfo can also support large-scale prospecting.

But its commercial model reflects the wider enterprise intelligence platform around the contact data.

Is ZoomInfo’s extra intelligence worth it for lead-list building?

Sometimes, absolutely.

Imagine two searches.

The first is:

“Find CFOs at Australian manufacturing companies with 100–500 employees.”

The second is:

“Find CFOs at Australian manufacturing companies with 100–500 employees that use a particular technology, are showing relevant intent and meet additional account-prioritisation criteria.”

For the first search, a focused contact-data platform may be enough.

For the second, ZoomInfo’s broader intelligence becomes much more valuable.

This is why the choice should not be based only on which platform has more features.

The real question is whether those features improve your specific lead list.

Which offers better value for lead-list building?

If the main job is retrieving targeted B2B contacts, Disburse is likely to offer the stronger value proposition.

The business is mainly paying for the leads rather than a much broader enterprise GTM platform.

ZoomInfo can offer strong value when the organisation actively uses its deeper:

  • Intelligence

  • Enrichment

  • Account prioritisation

  • Sales context

So the better comparison is:

If you need the contacts, Disburse is more focused.

If you need the contacts plus deep account intelligence, ZoomInfo is more comprehensive.

When should you use ZoomInfo to build lead lists?

ZoomInfo is likely the better option when:

  • Account intelligence is central to targeting

  • You need technographic criteria

  • Buyer intent influences prioritisation

  • Website activity matters

  • CRM data needs extensive enrichment

  • You have a mature RevOps function

  • Account-level research is part of prospecting

  • Salespeople need significant context around each prospect

  • You are running enterprise ABM programmes

Its strength is not simply creating a list.

It is adding intelligence around the accounts on that list.

When should you use Disburse to build lead lists?

Disburse is likely the better option when:

  • You can describe your ICP clearly

  • You mainly need company and contact data

  • You want to get from ICP to list quickly

  • You prospect heavily across APAC

  • You regularly change target audiences

  • You are testing new markets

  • You already have a CRM or outbound platform

  • You want REST access

  • You want MCP access

  • You are building AI-driven prospecting workflows

  • You need high-volume data

  • You want simple credit usage

  • You need mobile numbers without extra credit charges

  • You do not need enterprise sales-intelligence infrastructure

Its strength is reducing the distance between describing who you want and getting the data.

ZoomInfo vs Disburse: which is better for building targeted lead lists?

For most businesses whose main goal is building targeted B2B lead lists, Disburse is likely the more practical option.

It lets the user describe the target audience naturally, retrieve structured person and company data, and move those leads into whatever system comes next.

That is especially useful for:

  • Founders

  • Growing sales teams

  • Agencies

  • Developers

  • APAC-focused businesses

ZoomInfo is stronger when list building is part of a deeper account-intelligence strategy.

Its technographics, intent signals, enrichment and wider account intelligence can help enterprise teams go beyond identifying who fits the ICP.

It can also help decide which accounts deserve attention first.

The simplest distinction is:

Disburse helps you answer: “Who matches our ICP?”

ZoomInfo can help you answer: “Who matches our ICP, and what else do we know about this account?”

If the first question is the job you need done, Disburse is likely the more focused choice.

If the second question is essential to your sales strategy, ZoomInfo has the deeper platform.

Frequently asked questions

Is Disburse good for building targeted B2B lead lists?

Yes.

Targeted B2B list building is one of Disburse’s core use cases.

Users can describe an ICP using person, company and geographic criteria and retrieve matching contacts.

Is ZoomInfo good for building lead lists?

Yes.

ZoomInfo provides extensive B2B data and deeper sales intelligence that can be used to create highly targeted prospect and account lists.

Which is easier for building a lead list?

For straightforward ICP-based searches, Disburse is designed to provide the simpler workflow.

ZoomInfo provides greater depth when the list requires extra enterprise sales intelligence.

Which is better for highly targeted lists?

It depends on the targeting criteria.

Disburse is strong for precise person, company and geographic targeting.

ZoomInfo is stronger where the list also depends on technographics, buyer intent and deeper account signals.

Which is better for APAC lead lists?

Disburse is especially relevant for teams building lists across Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and other APAC markets.

Users can describe regional ICPs directly in natural language.

Actual data coverage should still be tested against the specific market being targeted.

Can Disburse build lists by company size?

Yes.

Employee count can be included in a Disburse search.

Can Disburse build lists by company revenue?

Yes.

Company revenue can be used as part of the target criteria.

Can Disburse search by job title and seniority?

Yes.

Job title, seniority and job function are available person criteria.

Can Disburse find emails and mobile numbers?

Yes.

Disburse can return available business emails and direct phone numbers alongside person and company data.

Does Disburse charge extra for mobile numbers?

No.

Mobile numbers do not cost extra credits.

Can Disburse build lead lists through AI?

Yes.

Disburse supports natural-language prospect discovery as well as REST and MCP access.

This allows B2B data retrieval to form part of AI agents and automated workflows.

Which is better for agencies?

Disburse can be useful for agencies that often switch between client ICPs because each audience can be described naturally.

ZoomInfo may be more suitable for agencies running advanced enterprise ABM or account-intelligence programmes.

Which is better for small sales teams?

For small teams mainly needing B2B data, Disburse is likely to be the more practical option.

ZoomInfo becomes more useful when the team needs deeper sales intelligence and enterprise workflows.

Which is better for enterprise teams?

ZoomInfo generally has the stronger proposition for enterprise teams that need account intelligence, buyer intent, technographics and extensive CRM enrichment.

Can Disburse replace ZoomInfo for lead generation?

It can replace the contact-discovery and targeted list-building part of ZoomInfo for businesses that mainly need person and company data.

It is not designed to replace ZoomInfo’s full enterprise intelligence offering.

Which is better overall for targeted lead lists?

For straightforward ICP-to-list prospecting, Disburse is likely the better fit.

For intelligence-rich account targeting involving intent, technologies and enterprise sales context, ZoomInfo provides more depth.

APAC Prospectinglead generationAccount IntelligenceB2B Contact DatabaseAI ProspectingZoomInfoB2B DataSales ProspectingData EnrichmentBuyer IntentDisburseABMB2B Lead ListsIdeal Customer Profile (ICP)